RTI – How to Get the Info You Need Under the Right to Information Act

Ever wondered why a government department keeps something hidden? Chances are you can ask for it under the RTI Act. It’s a simple law that lets any Indian citizen request records, answers, or data from public bodies. No need to be a lawyer or a bureaucrat – just follow a few easy steps and you’re set.

The first thing you need is a clear idea of what you want. Is it a financial report, a policy draft, or a list of appointments? Write it down in plain language. The more specific you are, the quicker the department can locate the file. Avoid vague phrases like “all documents” – they’ll just stall the process.

Filing an RTI Application: The Basics

Step 1: Find the correct Public Information Officer (PIO). Every department has a designated PIO listed on its website or at the office. If you can’t locate it online, a quick phone call usually does the trick.

Step 2: Draft your application. You can use a simple format – address the PIO, mention the RTI Act, state your request, and add a line about the fee (Rs 10 for most cases). Many people paste a template, but make sure you change the details to match your query.

Step 3: Pay the fee. Most offices accept cash, demand draft, or online payment. Keep the receipt – you’ll need it if the department asks for proof of payment.

Step 4: Submit the application. You can hand it over, send it by post, or use the department’s e‑portal if they have one. Getting a stamped copy of your submission is a good habit; it serves as proof that the request was made.

What Happens After You Submit?

Once the PIO receives your request, the law gives them 30 days to respond. If the information falls under an exemption, they must explain why it’s blocked and point to the specific rule. If you get a delayed or incomplete answer, you have the right to appeal.

The first level of appeal goes to the Senior PIO of the same department. Write a short appeal letter, attach a copy of the original request, and mention the response you received. Most senior PIOs are eager to clear things up, so you often get the missing data here.

If the senior PIO still refuses or you’re not satisfied, you can approach the State Information Commission. Their hearings are usually informal – you just need to present the documents and explain why you think the decision is wrong. The commission can order the department to release the info or even levy a penalty.

Speed‑up tip: include your email address or mobile number in the application. Many departments now send replies electronically, which cuts down waiting time.

Common pitfalls to avoid: sending a request to the wrong office, using ambiguous language, or forgetting to attach the fee receipt. Also, don’t ask for personal data about another citizen – that’s a clear exemption.

In practice, the RTI Act works best for straightforward requests: budget figures, project statuses, or policy documents. For more complex investigations, you might need to file several applications targeting different sections of a department.

Finally, keep a file of every RTI you file. Note the dates, the PIO’s name, and the response you receive. This record helps you track progress and is useful if you need to bring a case before the Information Commission.

With the right approach, RTI becomes a powerful tool to bring transparency into everyday life. So the next time you hit a wall with a government office, remember you have the law on your side – just draft a clear request, pay the small fee, and let the process do its work.

post-image
May, 1 2023

Supreme Court opens itself: Office of Chief Justice under RTI?

In a historic move, the Supreme Court has opened itself up to transparency by bringing the Office of the Chief Justice under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. This decision marks a significant step towards ensuring accountability and openness in the judicial system. As a blogger, I am thrilled to see this development, as it will allow citizens to access information about the functioning of the highest judicial office in the country. However, it remains to be seen how this move will be implemented and what impact it will have on the overall transparency of the judiciary. Nonetheless, this is a milestone in the journey towards a more transparent and accountable democracy.